37 posts tagged with "keycloak"

As more companies build SaaS platforms, the need to serve multiple customer groups—or tenants—from a single system becomes critical. In the identity world, this means implementing multi-tenancy within your identity provider.

In this post, we’ll walk through:

• What multi-tenancy means in Keycloak
• The drawbacks of using multiple realms for tenants
• Why organizations are a better, more scalable approach
• How the Phase Two Organizations extension supports advanced use cases like theming, shared IdPs, and user membership
• How our implementation differs from (and improves on) the new native Keycloak organizations feature

We've written extensively about how to model multi-tenancy with organizations and how Phase Two's Organizations extension differs from the native implementation being undertaken by the Keycloak team.

All of Phase Two's hosted environments come standard with all of our popular extensions to make it easy to hit the ground running and cover 95% of all IAM use-cases.

IdP Initiated Flow​

When implementing SAML for the establishment of an Identity Provider, two primary options are available:

1. Service Provider (SP) initiated
2. Identity Provider (IdP) initiated

The SP initiated flow is widely recognized by users due to its straightforward configuration, which is merely the exchange of some metadata. In contrast, the IdP-initiated flow is less intuitive and involves an additional step that may not be readily apparent to many users. The purpose of this blog is to elucidate the steps necessary to successfully execute the IdP-initiated flow. We will setup a full example

A fundamental understanding of SAML 2.0 and Keycloak is required to effectively follow the provided instructions.

Why consider Phase Two for your Managed Keycloak Provider​

When it comes to identity and access management, Keycloak has established itself as the go-to open-source solution for authentication, authorization, and user management. However, successfully integrating and maintaining Keycloak requires more than just hosting—it requires expertise. That’s where the difference between Phase Two and other hosting providers becomes clear.

In this post, we’ll explore why Phase Two should be in strong consideration for your Managed Keycloak provider, especially when compared to providers like CloudIAM, Elest.io, and Servana, who focus solely on hosting the standard build of Keycloak.

Part 4: Cost-Effectiveness of Open Source​

At the heart of every startup's decision-making process lies the bottom line. We’re in an economy where cost-cutting measures are being taken across organizations, and many companies are starting to ask why their identity stack is such an outsized drag on their margins. Keycloak presents a compelling case with its open-source nature. Unlike proprietary IAM solutions that come with hefty price tags and recurring subscription fees, Keycloak offers a cost-effective alternative without compromising on features or security.

By leveraging Keycloak, startups can significantly reduce their operational expenses, channeling those resources into core business activities such as product development and market expansion. Moreover, the open-source community surrounding Keycloak ensures continuous improvement and innovation, all without the burden of additional licensing costs.

Overview​

A multi-tenant application is a software architecture where a single instance of an application serves multiple, distinct customer groups or “tenants.” Each tenant, often representing an organization or user group, shares the same underlying infrastructure and codebase but operates within its own securely isolated environment. This allows each tenant to have individualized data, configurations, and sometimes even unique customizations, while benefiting from a shared platform that reduces overall resource demands and maintenance. Multi-tenancy is commonly used in SaaS (Software as a Service) applications, enabling businesses to scale efficiently, lower costs, and streamline updates while ensuring that each tenant’s data and settings remain private and distinct from others within the same application. This approach is particularly valuable in enterprise applications, where companies may need to provide access to different organizations, departments, or customer groups within a single solution.

Part 3: Customizability for Tailored Solutions: Why Keycloak Stands Out​

One size rarely fits all, especially in the world of enterprise software. Startups require flexibility to adapt and tailor IAM solutions to their unique business requirements. Keycloak shines in this aspect, offering extensive customization capabilities that empower startups to mold the platform according to their specific needs.

From branding and user interface customization to advanced authentication flows and authorization policies, Keycloak provides a comprehensive toolkit for startups to craft seamless and secure user experiences. Whether integrating with existing systems or building entirely new functionalities, Keycloak's flexibility ensures a perfect fit for any enterprise SaaS startup. Here’s how Keycloak’s flexibility stands apart from commercial, closed-source solutions, and why this is a key differentiator:

Keycloak and Native Applications​

Native applications for iOS, Android, and other platforms can integrate with Keycloak to provide secure, centralized authentication and authorization services. By utilizing Keycloak, these applications can streamline the user login experience through various protocols such as OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect, which Keycloak natively supports. With Keycloak, mobile applications can handle user sign-in, token management, and session handling securely, ensuring user identities are managed consistently across devices and platforms. This setup enables native applications to offload the complexities of authentication to Keycloak, allowing seamless integrations with features like Single Sign-On (SSO), social logins, and multi-factor authentication, while developers can focus on app functionality rather than handling sensitive user data directly. Additionally, Keycloak’s support for fine-grained access control and roles ensures that native apps can manage user permissions efficiently, creating a robust foundation for secure, scalable mobile applications.

Part 2 - Owning Your Data: Security, Privacy, and Control​

In the age of data breaches and privacy concerns, owning and controlling your user data is not just a preference but a strategic imperative for organizations, particularly when it comes to Identity and Access Management (IAM) solutions. Let's explore the reasons why owning your data matters and the risks associated with entrusting it to a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solution.

Part 1: Standardized Protocols and Minimal Feature Set Differentiation​

In the realm of Identity and Access Management (IAM) solutions, it's essential to recognize that many offerings, both commercial and open source, operate on standardized protocols such as OpenID Connect (OIDC), Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML), System for Cross-domain Identity Management (SCIM), Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), and more. This adherence to standardized protocols often results in minimal differentiation at the feature set level across various options. Let's delve into this further:

In the ever-evolving landscape of Enterprise SaaS, navigating the complexities of identity and access management (IAM) can be a daunting task. As a startup striving for excellence in user experience and security, choosing the right IAM solution is paramount. Enter Keycloak, a powerful open-source IAM tool that not only meets but exceeds the demands of modern startups.